Use case · Pre-PMF

Design partners for pre-PMF founders.

If you're pre-PMF and B2B SaaS, the design partner motion is the highest-leverage GTM motion you can run. It compresses 18 months of customer discovery into 6 months and produces reference customers along the way.

The problem

Pre-PMF founders default to cold outbound because it feels productive. But cold outbound to validate a product hypothesis is the wrong instrument — it filters for ICPs that respond to cold pitches, not ICPs that benefit from the product. The design partner motion inverts that: structured exchange agreements with 3-6 carefully-selected partners, in exchange for product feedback and a written commitment to convert at end-of-term.

Why this is different

What changes for this use case.

  • ·Design partner conversations advance hypothesis testing 5-10x faster than cold outbound replies, because the conversation depth is higher.
  • ·The exchange structure (free access for time + feedback) signals seriousness without taking pricing risk during the search.
  • ·Reference handoff at end-of-term produces the first two or three logos that anchor the post-PMF GTM motion.
Recommended reading

From the knowledge base.

The chapters that map to this use case, in suggested reading order.

Skip the build

We run the design partner motion alongside outbound.

Recruitment outreach, candidate qualification, agreement drafting, the weekly cadence, and conversion-to-paid. While we run cold outbound for the rest of the ICP in parallel.